With Real Intent

The founding claims

The Witnesses

What they actually described, and the prophet most of them followed next.

Concede this first, out loud

None of the eleven witnesses ever recanted. Several left the Church, fell out bitterly with Joseph Smith, and had every worldly reason to expose a fraud. None did. Martin Harris in 1870: "no man ever heard me in any way deny the truth of the Book of Mormon." Source

Say this before they do. The argument is not that they were lying.

The exhibits

Exhibit A

Doctrine and Covenants 17:2, the revelation that arranged the viewing, canonized scripture

given 1829

"And it is by your faith that you shall obtain a view of them, even by that faith which was had by the prophets of old."

What it establishes: The sight was promised as conditional on faith, in advance. That is a different kind of seeing than looking at an object on a table.

Read D&C 17
Exhibit B

David Whitmer, letter to Anthony Metcalf, in his own words

1887

"...we were in the spirit when we had the view, for no man can behold the face of an angel, except in a spiritual view, but we were in the body also, and everything was as natural to us, as it is at any time."

What it establishes: One of the Three describes the experience as a spiritual view. He never recanted it, which is the point: it can be entirely sincere and still be a vision rather than a physical inspection.

Whitmer’s 1887 pamphlet
Exhibit C

Martin Harris, reported by printer John H. Gilbert’s memorandum (a late secondhand recollection)

memo written 1892, of an earlier exchange

Asked whether he saw the plates "with your naked eyes," Harris reportedly answered: "No, I saw them with a spiritual eye."

What it establishes: Secondhand and recorded decades later, so weigh it accordingly, but it matches Whitmer’s own firsthand wording and the language of the revelation. Three independent lines point the same way.

FAIR’s own page
Exhibit D

David Whitmer, "An Address to All Believers in Christ," reaffirming his testimony while leaving the Church

1887

"...God spake to me again by his own voice from the heavens, and told me to separate myself from among the Latter Day Saints."

What it establishes: Whitmer kept his testimony of the plates to his death and still condemned the Church as having gone astray. His credibility cuts both ways, which is exactly why sincerity is not the question.

The pamphlet

The detail that does real work

After Joseph Smith's death, most of the witnesses accepted James Strang as a prophet. Strang also claimed to have found and translated ancient buried plates. Martin Harris was baptized into Strang's church and served a mission for it in England.

Today essentially everyone, including the LDS Church, regards Strang's plates as a fabrication. The same men whose discernment is offered as proof that Joseph's plates were real extended comparable trust to a second set the Church itself rejects.

Why this should make you question

The witnesses are taught as the objective anchor. When you read what they actually said, the Three describe a vision granted through faith, and most later gave similar testimony to a prophet the Church now calls false. That does not make them liars. It makes them exactly the kind of sincere religious witnesses every faith tradition can produce.

This page is part of a 76-topic library. Every claim links to its source, most of them the Church’s own. Read it on the full site or browse every topic.