The Bible underneath it

Archaeology and the Exodus

The scholar who defends biblical history still cannot get there.

The point in one sentence

Israel's national origin story, slavery in Egypt, the Exodus, forty years in the wilderness, and the conquest of Canaan, is not corroborated by archaeology and is actively contradicted by it.

The Exodus

"There is no direct evidence for any of the people or events of Exodus in non biblical ancient texts or in archaeological remains." Scholarly summary
The Bible's own count of 600,000 fighting men implies 2.5 to 3 million people.
The evidence shows continuity between Canaanite and early Israelite culture. The Israelites appear to have emerged from within Canaan rather than invading it.

Use this carefully, it is the strongest card

William Dever is not a minimalist and openly rejects that label. He has spent his career defending the historical kernels in the Bible against more radical skeptics. He still concludes that "the early Israelites were mostly indigenous Canaanites" and that the Exodus "is a myth or pseudo-history." Source

This is not an atheist activist. This is the archaeologist who argues with the skeptics on behalf of biblical history, and this is as far as the evidence lets him go.

Jericho

Kathleen Kenyon's excavation, later confirmed by radiocarbon dating, found Jericho's walls were destroyed and the site abandoned around 1550 BC, centuries before any proposed date for Joshua. National Geographic: at the time of the conquest, "Jericho didn't have any walls for the Israelites to knock down." Source

The flood

Scientific consensus: "there is no evidence for a universal flood in recent geologic history." National Center for Science Education
The Mesopotamian flood epics predate Genesis by centuries. Oxford's Professor John Day argues Genesis draws on that material, not the reverse. The shared details include the ark, sending out birds to test for dry land, and the sacrifice on the mountain afterward. Source

Why this should make you question

Ask what the archaeological record would have to look like for you to conclude the Exodus did not happen. If no possible finding would change your mind, the belief is not resting on evidence.

This page is part of a 76-topic library. Every claim links to its source, most of them the Church’s own. Read it on the full site or browse every topic.